Marketing & Growth

SEO / AEO / GEO

Get cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, not just ranked on Google.

We treat AEO/GEO as a technical engineering problem, not a content-volume play. Structured data, llm.txt, citation-friendly format design.

What this is

In plain English.

We make your business the source AI engines cite. As buyers shift from searching to asking ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google's AI overviews, the winners are the brands whose content is structured to be retrieved and quoted, not just the ones who publish the most.

We treat answer-engine and generative-engine optimization as an engineering problem: schema.org structured data, clean information architecture, llm.txt, and content formatted in the question-and-answer shape these models prefer to cite. We measure citation share, not just rankings.

Classic SEO still matters and we do it well, covering technical health, content, and links, but the differentiator is building citation-friendly assets and instrumenting whether AI engines actually surface you, then iterating like an optimization loop.

When you need this

Buyers are asking AI assistants questions your brand should be answering.
Your traffic is softening as AI overviews absorb informational searches.
You publish a lot of content but rarely get cited by AI engines.
You want to own category answers before competitors lock them in.

What's included

The deliverables, plainly stated.

Technical SEO foundation: crawl health, schema.org, site architecture
AEO/GEO content built in citation-friendly Q&A formats
llm.txt and structured-data implementation for AI retrieval
Citation-share tracking across ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity
Topic and entity strategy to own category answers
An ongoing optimization loop, not a one-time content drop

Typical duration

Ongoing (monthly), 90-day initial commitment

Investment band

$$Moderate investment

We scope in bands, not fixed numbers. Final pricing follows a quick scoping call.

How we deliver

A process built for this service, not a generic playbook.

01
Audit retrievability
We audit technical health, structured data, and how AI engines currently parse and cite your content.
02
Engineer the foundation
We implement schema.org, clean architecture, and llm.txt so models can retrieve and quote you reliably.
03
Produce citable assets
We create content in the Q&A and entity-rich formats that ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity prefer to cite.
04
Measure and iterate
We track citation share and rankings, then iterate the assets and structure as an ongoing optimization loop.

Team composition

An AEO/GEO strategist, a technical SEO engineer, and a content specialist, with a developer for structured-data implementation.

Tools & frameworks

schema.org structured data and llm.txt
Claude and OpenAI for citation testing and format design
Google Search and analytics for ranking signals
Native Bridge citation-share tracking

Outcomes you can expect

What we tie this engagement to.

Every engagement carries a revenue-tied KPI. These are the outcomes this service typically anchors on.

Growing citation share across major AI answer engines

Durable organic visibility as search shifts to AI

Ownership of the category questions buyers actually ask

Works with your stack

We deliver SEO / AEO / GEO inside the tools you already run.

See all integrations →

FAQ

SEO / AEO / GEO: common questions

What's the difference between SEO, AEO, and GEO?

SEO optimizes for ranking in traditional search results. AEO (answer-engine optimization) and GEO (generative-engine optimization) optimize for being retrieved and cited by AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google's AI overviews. We do all three, with AEO/GEO as the differentiator.

How do you get a brand cited by ChatGPT or Claude?

We treat it as an engineering problem: schema.org structured data, llm.txt, clean information architecture, and content written in the citation-friendly Q&A format these models prefer, then we measure citation share and iterate.

Isn't AEO just publishing more content?

No. Volume doesn't earn citations; structure does. We focus on retrievability and citation-friendly formatting over raw output, which is why we treat it as a technical optimization loop rather than a content-volume play.

Can you measure whether AI engines actually cite us?

Yes. We track citation share across major AI answer engines alongside traditional rankings, so you can see whether ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity are surfacing your brand and how that changes as we iterate.

Does traditional SEO still matter?

Yes. Technical health, content quality, and links still underpin visibility, and AI engines often draw from well-ranked sources. We maintain strong classic SEO as the foundation and layer AEO/GEO on top.